|
Due to the low ratio of probationer to
Intensive Supervision Program Officer (40:1), the officer has
more opportunity to provide an increased level of surveillance
and supervision of each probationer.
The ISP officer is trained and experienced in working
with higher risk offenders.
The officer, utilizing the CJAD Case Classification
System and Strategies for Case Supervision processes, determines
risk/needs levels of the probationer, develops an individualized
supervision plan, and arranges for the probationer to receive
any needed special services to ensure public safety and promote
responsible behavior.
The officer conducts a minimum of 4 face-to-face contacts
per month with each probationer, with 2 of the contacts
occurring in the field.
In addition to any conditions of probation placed on
offenders in the Intensive Supervision program, a mandatory
curfew is required (8:00 p.m.) and frequent drug/alcohol
screenings are performed.
Length of stay on the program for a
probationer will be twelve months.
At the end of twelve months, an individual is assessed to
determine if Intensive Supervision can be terminated and the
individual returned to a lower level of supervision. Successful completion is accomplished by the probationer complying
with the terms and conditions of supervision, the Case
Classification Supervision Plan, and the rules and regulations
of the program.
This program assists the jurisdiction in
reducing reliance on traditional incarceration and/or promotes
the rehabilitation of offenders because all cases are
diversions. In other
words, had it not been for this sentencing alternative, all ISP
cases would have been revoked to TDCJ-ID.
The following table illustrates activity of
the Intensive Supervision Program from FY ’04 through ’09:
|
|
Intensive Supervision Program
Historical Program Activity
FY '04 - '09
|
|
|
|
FY’04
|
FY'05
|
FY'06
|
FY’07
|
FY’08
|
FY’09
|
|
Intakes
|
66
|
53
|
56
|
48
|
46
|
58
|
|
Discharges
|
61
|
59
|
59
|
51
|
48
|
53
|
|
Served
|
109
|
101
|
98
|
87
|
82
|
90
|
The following table illustrates Intensive Supervision Program
discharge data by Discharge Reason:
|
|
Intensive
Supervision Program Discharges by Discharge Reason
Fiscal
Years ’04-’09
|
|
|
|
FY’04 (N=61)
|
FY’05
(N=59)
|
FY’06
(N=59)
|
FY’07
(N=51)
|
FY’08 (N=48)
|
FY’09
(N=53)
|
|
Completion of Program
|
27
|
19
|
22
|
22
|
25
|
16
|
|
Inappropriate Placement
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
4
|
2
|
7
|
|
Violation of Program
|
26
|
24
|
30
|
22
|
19
|
28
|
|
Absconded
|
0
|
0
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
0
|
|
Transfer
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Death
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Other Overriding Activity
|
6
|
13
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N=Total
Number Discharged
|